The House of Lords has survived many attempts at reform. This time, its opponents believe, may be different.
n
What the Bill Proposes
n
The Reform of the Second Chamber Bill would reduce the Lords from its current 800-plus membership to a smaller elected senate of 300 members, serving fixed twelve-year terms with no possibility of re-election.
n
Hereditary peers would be removed entirely — completing the half-finished work of the 1999 reforms. Appointed life peers currently serving would be offered a transitional arrangement, with staggered retirement over six years.
n
The Constitutional Stakes
n
Critics argue that an elected second chamber would inevitably challenge the primacy of the Commons. The West Lothian Question would acquire a new dimension: why should an elected senator for Scotland vote on England-only legislation?
n
Supporters counter that democratic legitimacy is precisely the point. An unelected chamber that can delay — and occasionally defeat — elected governments lacks the mandate its constitutional role requires.
n
The Numbers
n
The bill passed its second reading with a majority of 47. Committee stage hearings have heard from over 60 witnesses, and the process of amendment is likely to substantially alter the final text.
n
Royal Assent, if it comes, is not expected before 2026 at the earliest.
n
